Review

#Oppo #Mediatek #Android #Reno #12F #Review

Smartphones

Oppo Reno12 F Review. Deze telefoon van 239 euro werkt erg lang op een acculading. - Testresultaten: PCMark for Android Storage 2.0

Auteur: Frank Everaardt
Donderdag, 26.09.2024 om 08:00 uur

Pagina 10: Testresultaten: PCMark for Android Storage 2.0

De opslag van de Reno12 F is niet bijzonder snel.

PCMark for Android Storage 2.0

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 3)

60077 XX

ASUS ROG Phone 8 (X Mode) (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 3)

55201 XX

Motorola edge 50 Ultra (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s gen 3)

54364 XX

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s gen 3)

53519 XX

ASUS ROG Phone 8 (Dynamic Mode) (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 3)

53490 XX

Poco F6 Pro (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 2)

50440 XX

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 3)

47989 XX

Xiaomi Poco F6 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s gen 3)

45794 XX

Xiaomi 14 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 3)

44214 XX

OnePlus 11 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 2)

43104 XX

Samsung Galaxy Flip6 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 3)

42832 XX

OnePlus 12 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 3)

42098 XX

Samsung S23 Ultra (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 2)

41636 XX

Nothing 2a Plus (Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro)

38253 XX

Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 gen 3)

37313 XX

Nothing Phone (2a) (Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Pro)

36897 XX

Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 3)

36463 XX

Redmagic 7S Pro(Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ gen 1)

35749 XX

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra)

35017 XX

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Google Tensor G4)

34780 XX

Samsung S23 FE (Samsung Exynos 2200)

34572 XX

Redmagic 7 Pro(Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 1)

33534 XX

Google Pixel 9 (Google Tensor G4)

33470 XX

Sony Xperia 1 VI (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 3)

33396 XX

Motorola edge 50 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 gen 1)

32808 XX

Oppo A80 (Mediatek Dimensity 6300)

32705 XX

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (Google Tensor G4)

32705 XX

Vivo X80 Pro (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 1)

31608 XX

Oppo Reno12 Pro (Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy)

30926 XX

Samsung S24 Ultra (Snapdragon 8 gen 3)

29645 XX

Nothing Phone (1) (Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+)

28414 XX

Motorola edge 50 Fusion (Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s gen 2)

28163 XX

Motorola Razr 50 (Mediatek Dimensity 7300X)

27945 XX

Google Pixel 8a (Google Tensor G3)

26036 XX

Google Pixel 6a (Google Tensor)

25488 XX

OnePlus Open (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 2)

25412 XX

Motorola edge 50 neo (Mediatek Dimensity 7300)

25397 XX

Google Pixel 7a (Google Tensor G2)

25209 XX

Google Pixel 7 Pro (Google Tensor G2)

24957 XX

Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Samsung Exynos 2400)

24782 XX

Oppo Reno12 (Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy)

23786 XX

Motrolora edge 60 (Mediatek Dimensity 7300)

23784 XX

Google Pixel 8 Pro (Google Tensor G3)

23119 XX

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Qualcomm Snapdragon 860)

22889 XX

Sony Xperia 10 VI (Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 gen 1)

22811 XX

Motorola G04 (Unisoc T606)

22776 XX

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G)

22730 XX

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro (Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s gen 2)

22544 XX

HMD Skyline (Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s gen2)

22315 XX

OPPO Reno11F 5G (Mediatek Dimensity 7050)

22118 XX

OnePlus 10 Pro (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 1)

21558 XX

Motorola g85 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s gen 3)

20898 XX

HMD Pule Pro (Unisoc T606)

20714 XX

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Samsung Exynos 2400)

20643 XX

OPPO Reno12 F (Mediatek Dimensity 6300)

18673 XX

Samsung Galaxy A55 (Samsung Exynos 1480)

17597 XX

Google Pixel 9 Pro (Google Tensor G4)

17238 XX

Xiaomi Poco X5 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 695)

16892 XX

Samsung Galaxy A15 5G (Mediatek Dimensity 6100+)

16774 XX

Oneplus Nord 3 (Mediatek Dimensity 9000)

15499 XX

Samsung Galaxy A35 (Samsung Exynos 1380)

13776 XX

OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite (Qualcomm Snapdragon 695)

13621 XX

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Mediatek Dimensity 700)

13289 XX

OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite (Qualcomm Snapdragon 695)

12410 XX

Xiaomi Poco C65 (Mediatek Helio G85)

11272 XX

Motorola G24 (Mediatek Helio G85)

8795 XX

punten

Meer is beter

Advertentie

Pagina 9: Testresultaten: PCMark for Android Work 3.0 Pagina 11: Testresultaten: Accuduur

Bronnen en meer links

Advertentie

REACTIES (11)

{{{_source.title}}} {{#_source.showPrice}} {{{_source.displayPrice}}} {{/_source.showPrice}}

Smartphones Oppo Reno12 F Review. Deze telefoon van 239 euro werkt erg lang op een acculading. - Testresultaten: PCMark for Android Storage 2.0

PCMark for Android Storage 2.0

Smartphones

Oppo Reno12 F Review. Deze telefoon van 239 euro werkt erg lang op een acculading. - Testresultaten: PCMark for Android Storage 2.0